
"If we're completely wrong and you completely screw up the entire music market for Mac owners, the sandbox is small enough that you really won't damage the overall music industry very much." That was one instance where Macintosh's [small] market share helped us.
Fascinating article. I enjoyed the read. Now I feel like running out & finally getting that iPod I've been wanting!
You won't regret it! :-)
I think this article is interesting when compared to the Ballmer article I seeded:
Ballmer on Zune community features:
I want to squirt you a picture of my kids. You want to squirt me back a video of your vacation. That's a software experience.
Creepy -- at best.
Jobs on the Zune community features and why the iPod wins without having them:
Hrm. The site isn't loading but to paraphrase:
1. Zune is slow when transferring songs.
2. The girl has left by the time it works.
3. You're better off giving her one of your iPod earbuds.
4. You are then separated by only 2 feet of cord.
-That- is the sort of thinking that will continue to make the iPod successful.
Jobs and Ballmer both want to make money for their companies.
The difference (in my opinion) is that Microsoft starts out by thinking how they can make a lot of money and Apple starts out thinking how they can make a great product that people will love and that will make a lot of money.
Another difference: If Steve had to compromise his vision to make money (or make a product that was dumbed down for the consumer) -- I don't think he'd do it.
True 'dat. And if MSFT is going to be using the term "squirt" to describe the transferring of digital DNA back and forth, the Zune is dead in the water.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |